What challenge is associated with concurrent group and individual therapy as described by Yalom?

The challenge associated with concurrent group and individual therapy as described by Yalom is the potential for clients to become overly reliant on individual therapy for emotional regulation. In settings where both types of therapy are used, individuals may favor individual sessions for addressing deep emotional issues, which can lead to a diminished focus on group dynamics and the benefits that emerge from interacting with peers in a group setting.

When clients depend heavily on individual therapy, they might miss out on the supportive network and feedback available within the group, which can be critical for learning and practicing interpersonal skills. Moreover, the therapeutic process in the group relies on shared experiences and insights, and excessive reliance on one-on-one therapy can disrupt the development of group cohesion and mutual support. By addressing issues solely in the individual context, clients can circumvent the valuable therapeutic interactions that group therapy offers, potentially undermining the overall treatment process.

Increasing group cohesiveness, limited therapist involvement, and decreased motivation in the group setting are not inherently challenges outlined by Yalom regarding the concurrent therapy approach. Cohesiveness typically improves with group therapy, while a skilled therapist often remains actively involved in both settings.